CHALLENGE:
A contract wine packing company was utilising lenticular filters to check if their wine had failed Filterability Index testing prior to being offloaded from tankers. Filterability Index testing was also carried out on the wine prior to transfer from the storage tank. As the demand for lenticular filters increased they experienced supply problems with their lenticular supplier.
SOLUTION:
After investigating the customer's challenge, Parker recommended that they trial their PROPOR NG filters as an alternative to their lenticular filters.
BENEFITS:
The trial was as success. The PREPOR NG reached the acceptable Filterability Index level more effectively than when using a lenticular filter. This has given the bottler a viable, long-term alternative, with a robust local supply chain. PREPOR NG filters are also more cost effective.
Faced with supply issues and inefficiencies using lenticular filters for Filterability Index testing, our customer sought a reliable and effective solution. Parker's Prepor NG filters not only met but exceeded the required Filterability Index levels, providing a cost-effective, long-term alternative with a robust local supply chain.
Parker has developed a strong relationship with a large contract wine packing company. The customer receives deliveries of bulk wine in 24,000 litre flexibags and 26,000 litre rigid tanks, which is offloaded under inert gasses into stainless steel tanks.
Previously, the customer had been using lenticular filters in its filtration processes at the tanker offloading stage. The wine would be passed through the lenticular filters if it had failed FI testing prior to being offloaded from tankers – typically this failure would be due to the wine having a high sugar and yeast content, often attributed to unfavourable environmental conditions during harvest. In addition, FI testing was carried out on the wine prior to the transfer from the storage tank – if a requirement for pre-conditioning prior to the filling stage was identified, lenticular filters would again be employed by the customer.
As the demand for lenticular filters increased, due to more product shipments failing FI testing, the company also began to experience supply problems, which could have impacted on the productivity and efficiency of its bottling operations.
After investigating the customer’s challenge, Parker recommended that they trial Parker’s PREPOR NG filters – which have been designed for pre-stabilisation applications in wine and other beverages – as an alternative to the lenticular filters.
Parker determined that 0.5 µm PREPOR NG filters, would be able to meet the flow rate and sterilising grade specification set out by the customer. Parker’s PREPOR NG filters, which were developed in collaboration with beverage producers, are validated for yeast removal and bacterial reduction, and feature a mechanically strong and chemically resistant polypropylene construction.
The trial was a success, with the customer identifying that after filtering wine with PREPOR NG it reached the acceptable FI level more effectively than the equivalent process using a lenticular filter. This has given the bottler a viable, long-term alternative to using lenticular filters, with a robust local supply chain, and by using Parker’s PREPOR NG filters, it has been able to continue processing wine with high levels of yeast, sugar and sediment.
Parker PREPOR NG filters are also more cost effective than lenticular alternatives, and by adopting these filters, the bottler has reduced the charge back costs for its end customers. As the bottler was already using Parker’s PREPOR NG filters in other parts of the site, they were familiar with SOPs, cleaning procedures, filter technology and associated hardware: this has helped them to ensure the filters are reaching their optimum performance levels and maximum lifespans, while reducing operational complexity.